I don't agree that the most recent 4 have been a success, either. ![]() ![]() Why else do we have nothing-civs like Slavs and Incas that are poor-man's versions of other civs? And anything unique about them gets squashed out over time because they're not possible to balance. With the bloated civ list we have now, there's no scope for that without breaking game balance. Some of us would like far fewer than 40, and for more genuine difference between them. I mean, I don't think this is necessarily the case. I just don’t understand people reasoning for restricting the game to 40 Civs. r/projectceleste - Age of Empires Online ![]() Official Forums - Bug Reporting/Ask for HelpĪrchive of Old/Inactive Channels - WIP - here Other AoE Communities
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |